<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strange NOT IN behavior with NULL values in SQL Database queries!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joesvolcano.net/2009/12/127/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joesvolcano.net/2009/12/127/</link>
	<description>Joe&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://joesvolcano.net/2009/12/127/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joesvolcano.net/?p=127#comment-327</guid>
		<description>This was from a discussion with Jon, my friend here at work.  Jon ran across the NOT IN issue and together we delved further in to explore the limits of the workarounds...  Yeah, it totally seems like we&#039;ve uncovered a real in-consistency in SQL standard.  I know the reason behind the regular NULL behavior, but these don&#039;t seem to jive with those ideas...  Anyhoo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was from a discussion with Jon, my friend here at work.  Jon ran across the NOT IN issue and together we delved further in to explore the limits of the workarounds&#8230;  Yeah, it totally seems like we&#8217;ve uncovered a real in-consistency in SQL standard.  I know the reason behind the regular NULL behavior, but these don&#8217;t seem to jive with those ideas&#8230;  Anyhoo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

